African lions on the hunt prowl the edge of a herd, single out one buffalo, then hunt as a pack to separate the individual from the herd and bring it down. In The Hockey Stick and the Climate Wars, Michael E. Mann notes that critics of climate science often use the same tactic, which he dubs ‘The Serengeti Strategy.’ Continue reading
Tag Archives: skeptics
Climate Communication Graphics –
‘Escalator’ critics miss the point
In November 2011 Dana N. at Skeptical Science produced this striking animated graph called ‘The Escalator.’ The graph clearly demonstrates how critics cherry-pick short periods of time to convince themselves that ‘warming is over.’ [See “Skeptical cherry-picking, brilliantly exposed!”]
‘The Escalator’ went viral, and has also become a target for skeptics, who try to poke holes in it by questioning Continue reading
Climate Communication Tips
Note to self: “It’s the fear, stupid!”
We have to address the fears. That is my #1 take away climate communication message from the AGU meeting in San Francisco.
For many skeptics, resistance to accepting climate science stems primarily from fear, not ignorance or misinformation. Fear of what could be “taken away” from them if government mobilizes to address this problem. This came up in session after session on climate communication.
The corollary: We can never make progress with ardent skeptics by arguing endlessly about scientific nuances, Continue reading
Climate Communication Rebuttal:
Must read: The Debunking Handbook
Uh oh. Did you know that your efforts to correct climate misinformation could be backfiring? That you may be inadvertently be reinforcing the very myths you seek to dislodge?
For a quick self-check, download this short guide, The Debunking Handbook, by Skeptical Science’s John Cook and Prof. Stephan Lewandowsky. It’s free, and in just 6 pages shows you how to avoid the “backfire effect” and make your corrections stick.
You can trust Cook and Lewandowsky’s advice; it’s all solidly grounded in cognitive psychology research.
Here are my “Top Ten” take-away points: Continue reading
Climate communication graphics
Skeptical “cherry picking” — brilliantly exposed!
This stunning expose of “cherry-picking”—the “skeptic’s” favorite logical fallacy—takes climate charts to a new level. Continue reading
Climate communication tips
Muller knows BEST: Two kinds of skeptics
The recently-released BEST* study—which led prominent climate skeptic Dr. Richard Muller to finally accept that “global warming is real“—carries an important lesson for all communicators: Don’t drive honest skeptics into a corner. Continue reading
Climate communication graphics:
Best climate chart ever
Dr. Katharine Hayhoe has a knack for crystal clear graphics. She strips away the clutter, so the key point jumps out at you.
This simple graph delivers a knock-out punch to a favorite cherry-picking ploy: Continue reading
Climate Communication Tips
A touchstone for tone. . . and your real audience
“When you counsel someone, you should appear to be reminding him of something he had forgotten, not of the light he was unable to see.”
— Baltasar Gracian (1601-1658)
Gracian’s aphorism is a nice touchstone for “tone,” which is so crucial to winning over an audience. In a debate with a skeptic, keep in mind that the key audience is not your opponent; it’s the silent onlookers. Focusing on the skeptic across the table is like a trial lawyer Continue reading
Climate Change Humor
Doonesbury nails it: An Honest Man
More all-time favorite climate cartoons in Tools/Humor/Cartoons.
We also link to large, searchable online collections of cartoons related to climate/weather/environment. Unfortunately, the vast majority of ‘toons are either 1) hostile to climate science, 2) grim and bitter, or 3) both. So when you spot a climate cartoon or picture somewhere that actually makes you laugh (OK, even a little chuckle will do) please let us know!
Here is Gary Trudeau’s official Doonesbury site.
Climate Change SoundbiteScience is a jigsaw puzzle, not a house of cards
Here’s a great metaphor for explaining why minor errors — inevitable in any large scientific undertaking — do not invalidate climate science.
Skeptics want you to view climate science as a house of cards: If you pull one card from the bottom, the whole thing collapses.
But science is more like a jigsaw puzzle, Continue reading